Close Menu
Metals Weekly
    TRENDING -
    • Environmentalists Sue Federal Agencies Over Nation’s First Fast-Tracked Critical Minerals Mine
    • Mining Forum: Miners have cash but lack the crews
    • Hancock disputes report of rare-earths paper loss
    • Actor DiCaprio fights Belo Sun’s $300M Brazil mine
    • Gold Fields halts Windfall work as Quebec permit lapses
    • Brazil regulator orders partial halt at Sigma Lithium mine over ‘imminent risk’
    • Latin America mining risks carry $54B price tag
    • Copper price set for 3rd straight monthly gain; aluminum hits 2-month low
    Metals Weekly
    • Home
    • Critical Materials
    • Environment
    • Global Policy
    • Mining
    Metals Weekly
    Home»Global Policy»Trump’s tariffs are bringing in serious revenue—and it’d be even higher if not for tariff dodgers costing the government $40 billion a year

    Trump’s tariffs are bringing in serious revenue—and it’d be even higher if not for tariff dodgers costing the government $40 billion a year

    Global Policy 4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Trump’s tariffs are bringing in serious revenue—and it’d be even higher if not for tariff dodgers costing the government $40 billion a year
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Goldman Sachs warned that export data indicates increased rates of transshipments from China to the U.S. through third-party countries—a similar pattern observed during the 2018 trade war. The tariff evasion taking place today could impact more than $200 billion in U.S. imports, costing the U.S. $40 billion in tariff revenue if efforts to curb the sidestepping aren’t mitigated, bank analysts Joseph Briggs and Megan Peters said in a report.

    Earlier this month, Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, estimated the Trump administration’s tariff efforts will bring in a “very significant” $350 billion in annual revenue.

    As Trump imposes sweeping tariffs on countries—most recently a 100% tax on imported branded pharmaceuticals going into effect on Oct. 1—some companies have tried their best to take action to evade the levies. Many have warned that they face an impact worth billions of dollars each year. Goldman highlights the practice of transshipping, or reorganizing a supply chain to ship products from a country with lower imposed levies. Tariff dodging could also look like companies underreporting the value of goods or mislabeling products as similar goods that aren’t subject to as high of taxes.

    Citing data from the United Nations Comtrade database, Goldman noted a steep increase in exports from Asian countries—particularly Vietnam—to the U.S., coinciding with a similar increase in those countries’ imports from China. While part of the correlation could be due to other countries relying more on Chinese goods as a result of tariffs, the speed of the shift could indicate transshipping, analysts said.

    “Indeed, early patterns in trade data suggest some evasion of the recently implemented tariffs,” the note said.

    There are also signs of foreign exporters underreporting the value of U.S. imports at the border. The discrepancy between the U.S.’s reported imports from China and China’s reported exports to the U.S. has widened by $4 billion year-to-date, Goldman Sachs said. That widening gap is in spite of the sunsetting of the de minimis exemption that allowed packages worth less than $800 to enter the U.S. without duties.

    “Further, U.S. imports have been cut by larger amounts than can be plausibly explained by lower production costs, suggesting multinational companies may be avoiding tariffs by lowering reported U.S. import prices,” analysts said.

    How much has the U.S. previously lost through tariff evasion?

    Beyond early evidence suggesting countries may indeed be taking action to evade tariffs, evidence from Trump’s first administration—when he imposed import taxes on China—suggests the U.S. has previously lost $110 billion to $130 billion in revenue from tariff dodgers.

    According to U.S. trade data cited by Goldman Sachs in a January note, the share of Chinese imports to the U.S. fell from 21.5% in 2016 to 13.5% in 2023, indicating a $240 billion reduction in China exports.

    But the bank warned that this figure overstates the U.S.’s reduced reliance on Chinese exports because of tariff evasion. Goldman Sachs reported that $30 billion to $50 billion in trade was rerouted in 2023, accounting for nearly 20% of the dip in Chinese exports to the U.S. This transshipment effort only accounts for a fraction of the tariff evasion.

    “Underreporting and mislabeling have likely had an even larger impact,” analysts said in the January note.

    Due to reporting gaps on levied products, the gap between U.S.-reported China imports and China-reported U.S. exports widened by $150 billion. By Goldman Sachs estimations, the reporting gap was in part caused by $80 billion in tariff evasion. About $40 billion of that reporting discrepancy was due to mislabeling products as goods subject to lower tariffs.

    The Trump administration, for its part, has outlined plans to crack down on transshipments, threatening an additional 40% tariff on goods shipped through a third-party country with lower levies. The Justice Department’s Office of Public Affairs announced last month the creation of the Trade Fraud Task Force to mitigate tariff evasion, as well as import smuggling.

    The U.S. opened an investigation into Waaree Energies, India’s largest solar panel maker, to determine if it dodged duties bringing goods into the U.S., Bloomberg reported on Friday, citing a public notice.

    https://fortune.com/2025/09/26/trump-tariffs-revenue-loss-40-billion-tariff-evasion-goldman-sachs/

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Brazil regulator orders partial halt at Sigma Lithium mine over ‘imminent risk’

    Ghana bill would give state special share rights in mining firms, draft shows

    Nigeria mining crackdown under fire after 37 die

    Don't Miss

    Brazil regulator orders partial halt at Sigma Lithium mine over ‘imminent risk’

    Global Policy 1 Min Read

    Brazil’s mining regulator ANM has ordered Sigma Lithium (NASDAQ: SGML) to halt mining activities in…

    Ghana bill would give state special share rights in mining firms, draft shows

    Nigeria mining crackdown under fire after 37 die

    Canada could gain billions from refining more metals

    Top Stories

    Critical Minerals Refining Gap to Test Deep-Sea Mining Ambitions

    China Rare Earth eyes indirect stake in MP Materials

    The Metals Company NOAA Publishes TMC USA Deep-Sea Mining Application for Public Review

    Weak hydrogen bonds dethrone copper as the most stable metal binder, opening a new path for metal selection

    Our Picks

    Zambians pay price amid Copperbelt mining boom

    Zambia says privacy, minerals concerns stall US health aid deal

    Zambia mine regulator lifts suspension of operations at Mopani’s Mufulira mine

    Don't Miss

    Seabed mining talks show key issues remain unresolved

    Around two thirds of mining and metals facilities worldwide at risk of water stress

    Blue Star adds critical mineral prospect

    Weekly Newsletter

    Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter to keep up to date on the latest news in the metals, minerals and mining industry

    Copyright © 2025 - Metals Weekly. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.