Close Menu
Metals Weekly
    TRENDING -
    • Critical minerals push puts mining tech in spotlight
    • Diesel Price Volatility Squeezes Mining Margins in Mexico
    • Global Lithium Demand Drives Need for 134 New Mines by 2050
    • Industry fuels UAF Critical Minerals Engine
    • Washington interest boosts Alaska mining
    • $1M from DOE goes toward attracting mining talent
    • Punta Gorda City Council to oppose phosphate mining within city limits
    • Mexico’s Mining Sector Set for US$6.4 Billion Rebound
    Metals Weekly
    • Home
    • Critical Materials
    • Environment
    • Global Policy
    • Mining
    Metals Weekly
    Home»Environment»Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Environment 3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining
    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A new Forests and Finance Coalition report finds top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and BlackRock, support mining companies linked to deforestation, land-grabs, contamination and Indigenous rights violations.

    According to the report, from 2016-24, major banks provided $493 billion in loans and underwriting to mining companies, including Glencore, Rio Tinto and Vale. As of June 2025, investors held $289 billion in bonds and shares of 111 transition mineral companies.

    The report focuses on financing for companies mining critical minerals used in the global energy transition, including lithium, nickel, graphite and cobalt. Nearly 70% of these transition mineral mines overlap with Indigenous lands and roughly an equal amount is in regions of high biodiversity.

    Such minerals are widely used in clean energy technologies, such as solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles (EVs). But the way mining companies extract and process them is driving widespread environmental destruction and human rights abuses, the report said.

    “Our findings shed light on the central role that financial institutions play in enabling this new wave of destruction as companies rush to expand mining operations as rapidly as possible,” Steph Dowlen, forests and finance campaigner for the Rainforest Action Network, told Mongabay by email. “While this extraction for raw minerals falls under a ‘green’, ‘clean’ or ‘renewable’ banner, it’s still extraction and the mining sector remains high-risk, dominated by companies with egregious track records on rights, the environment and corporate accountability.”

    The report assessed environmental, social and governance policy scores of 30 major financial institutions and found an average score of only 22%. Vanguard and CITIC scored the lowest, each with just 3%. The assessment found that many financial institutions lacked policies to prevent financing issues, including pollution, Indigenous rights abuses or deforestation.

    Of all institutions assessed, 80% lacked policies on human rights defenders and none had safeguards for Indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation. Many institutions (60%) lacked grievance mechanisms, which allow communities that have been negatively impacted by mining activities to seek justice. Also, 60% of institutions had no policies on tax transparency, which is key to preventing companies from shifting profits abroad and ensuring that mining revenues remain in the resource-rich countries.

    “Due to the significant overlap with transition minerals and Indigenous Territories, and high-biodiversity areas, there is an immediate need for governments, financial institutions and mining companies to stop and listen,” Dowlen said. “Indigenous Peoples and local communities have been raising the alarm for a long time but continue to face disproportionate harm as well as violence and intimidation for defending their rights and their lands.”

    BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase declined to comment on the report. None of the other institutions mentioned in this piece responded to Mongabay’s emails.

    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Over 40 Mining Claims Filed in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

    Environmentalists Sue Federal Agencies Over Nation’s First Fast-Tracked Critical Minerals Mine

    Lawsuit seeks protections for two Nevada species threatened by gold mining

    Don't Miss

    Diesel Price Volatility Squeezes Mining Margins in Mexico

    Global Policy 5 Mins Read

    Global diesel price volatility and refining bottlenecks are increasing production costs across mining operations in…

    Brazil regulator orders partial halt at Sigma Lithium mine over ‘imminent risk’

    Ghana bill would give state special share rights in mining firms, draft shows

    Nigeria mining crackdown under fire after 37 die

    Top Stories

    You’ve got ore: Alaska’s tungsten history

    European Commission picks 46 new strategic critical mineral projects

    Critical Minerals Refining Gap to Test Deep-Sea Mining Ambitions

    China Rare Earth eyes indirect stake in MP Materials

    Our Picks

    Zambians pay price amid Copperbelt mining boom

    Zambia says privacy, minerals concerns stall US health aid deal

    Zambia says it is negotiating US minerals deal after ‘decoupling’ from health pact

    Don't Miss

    Mining growth creates trades worker gap in Ontario

    Resouro PEA points to $1B potential rare earth and titanium project

    The Critical Minerals Challenge Is Here

    Weekly Newsletter

    Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter to keep up to date on the latest news in the metals, minerals and mining industry

    Copyright © 2025 - Metals Weekly. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.