Close Menu
Metals Weekly
    TRENDING -
    • Sterling’s identity crisis
    • US First Nation holds up project in Canada
    • Trump reverses Minnesota mining ban
    • Securing Critical Minerals at Scale: Multilateral Solutions for Energy, Defense, and Semiconductor Supply Chains
    • DOE Explains…Critical Materials
    • Powering AI with Canadian natural hydrogen
    • Electra sizes up U.S. nickel refinery
    • FAST-41 approval for Wyoming rare earth mine adds pressure on separation tech demonstration plant.
    Metals Weekly
    • Home
    • Critical Materials
    • Environment
    • Global Policy
    • Mining
    Metals Weekly
    Home»Environment»Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Environment 3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining
    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A new Forests and Finance Coalition report finds top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and BlackRock, support mining companies linked to deforestation, land-grabs, contamination and Indigenous rights violations.

    According to the report, from 2016-24, major banks provided $493 billion in loans and underwriting to mining companies, including Glencore, Rio Tinto and Vale. As of June 2025, investors held $289 billion in bonds and shares of 111 transition mineral companies.

    The report focuses on financing for companies mining critical minerals used in the global energy transition, including lithium, nickel, graphite and cobalt. Nearly 70% of these transition mineral mines overlap with Indigenous lands and roughly an equal amount is in regions of high biodiversity.

    Such minerals are widely used in clean energy technologies, such as solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles (EVs). But the way mining companies extract and process them is driving widespread environmental destruction and human rights abuses, the report said.

    “Our findings shed light on the central role that financial institutions play in enabling this new wave of destruction as companies rush to expand mining operations as rapidly as possible,” Steph Dowlen, forests and finance campaigner for the Rainforest Action Network, told Mongabay by email. “While this extraction for raw minerals falls under a ‘green’, ‘clean’ or ‘renewable’ banner, it’s still extraction and the mining sector remains high-risk, dominated by companies with egregious track records on rights, the environment and corporate accountability.”

    The report assessed environmental, social and governance policy scores of 30 major financial institutions and found an average score of only 22%. Vanguard and CITIC scored the lowest, each with just 3%. The assessment found that many financial institutions lacked policies to prevent financing issues, including pollution, Indigenous rights abuses or deforestation.

    Of all institutions assessed, 80% lacked policies on human rights defenders and none had safeguards for Indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation. Many institutions (60%) lacked grievance mechanisms, which allow communities that have been negatively impacted by mining activities to seek justice. Also, 60% of institutions had no policies on tax transparency, which is key to preventing companies from shifting profits abroad and ensuring that mining revenues remain in the resource-rich countries.

    “Due to the significant overlap with transition minerals and Indigenous Territories, and high-biodiversity areas, there is an immediate need for governments, financial institutions and mining companies to stop and listen,” Dowlen said. “Indigenous Peoples and local communities have been raising the alarm for a long time but continue to face disproportionate harm as well as violence and intimidation for defending their rights and their lands.”

    BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase declined to comment on the report. None of the other institutions mentioned in this piece responded to Mongabay’s emails.

    Report links world’s top banks to social & environmental harms from mining

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    US First Nation holds up project in Canada

    Trump reverses Minnesota mining ban

    Mining giant polluted Quebec waters for over a decade before $100M fine. What took so long?

    Don't Miss

    Metals From Copper to Gold Slump as Inflation Fears Roil Markets

    Global Policy 2 Mins Read

    Metals from gold to copper sank in a broad selloff in financial markets amid investor…

    TMC The Metals Moves Toward Commercial Seafloor Production With Allseas Deal

    Prismo Metals Reports Positive Results from Reconnaissance Mapping and Sampling at Silver King Project, Arizona

    TMC scores regulatory win in race to mine Pacific seafloor

    Top Stories

    Electra sizes up U.S. nickel refinery

    Anger grows after China’s deadliest coal mining disaster in years

    Arctic Mine gains FAST-41 permitting status

    Scientists Discover a New Way To Control Metals at the Atomic Scale

    Our Picks

    Zambians pay price amid Copperbelt mining boom

    Zambia says privacy, minerals concerns stall US health aid deal

    Zambia mine regulator lifts suspension of operations at Mopani’s Mufulira mine

    Don't Miss

    Bravus Mining and Resources to increase Carmichael mine production

    Unchecked mining waste taints DR Congo communities

    Australian mining firm strikes high-grade rare minerals in Namibia’s Kameelburg project

    Weekly Newsletter

    Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter to keep up to date on the latest news in the metals, minerals and mining industry

    Copyright © 2025 - Metals Weekly. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.